Started By
Message

SEC 2000-2009 or 2010-current

Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:17 pm
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:17 pm
Which do you believe is tougher?
Does the addition of Missouri and A&M make the SEC stronger than ever before?
Are teams from earlier seen as inferior to the teams of today?
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
21612 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:21 pm to
East was certainly tougher in 2000-2009 than it is now.

West is as strong as it's ever been and the addition of A&M has made it even more competitive, IMO.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 5:29 pm to
Current. Because the athletes are better every year, cumulatively.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37733 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 6:01 pm to
Currently the West is stronger than past years because they've allotted a larger percentage of their budget to sign the best talent within their Western Division salary caps.
Posted by boxedlunch
Member since May 2012
484 posts
Posted on 12/19/14 at 10:14 am to
Looking at the non-conference numbers:

LINK

It would seem to be a no-brainer.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter