Started By
Message
re: This year puts Mark Ingram's Heisman to shame.
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:48 am to AUTigermitch1995
Posted on 12/12/14 at 10:48 am to AUTigermitch1995
quote:
PrivatePublic: This year puts Mark Ingram's Heisman to shame.
BS. And there have been several years, even before Ingram, where 2,000 yard rushers didn't win...I believe Troy Davis had back-to-back 2,000 yard seasons, back in the 90's, and didn't win either time...
quote:
AUTigermitch1995: Still believe Suh should have won it.
Ingram was a worthy winner in 2009...but any of the other finalists, Suh, Gerhart, McCoy, and Tebow would've been worthy as well. Just happened to be a year where no one put up PlayStation-like numbers. If Ingram had those same stats in the years preceding or any of the years after, he wouldn't have won it. He just happened to do it in a year where Bama went undefeated/captured a title, compiled good stats to be comparable to his closest competitors, and had a couple of Heisman moments (South Carolina, SECCG)...and unlike past (Bush, Bradford, Tebow) and future (Cam, RG3, Johnny Football) seasons, there was no one standout, aka "WOW", player to emerge...
This post was edited on 12/12/14 at 10:57 am
Posted on 12/12/14 at 11:18 am to OldPete
I don't agree with the OP. But for the Bama fans comparing Bo and Ingrams numbers
L
O
L
Do y'all even 25 years apart bro?
L
O
L
Do y'all even 25 years apart bro?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)