Started By
Message
Thinking about the four team playoff, how long until we get to eight?
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:21 am
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:21 am
I think the four teams chosen were probably correct. We got some great matchups. But I think you could argue there were six teams who had a legitimate argument to be in the final four.
I wonder how much the conference titles mattered? What I mean is, do you think the new format will pretty much exclude a non-conference champion SEC team in the future.
I hope that we get to an eight team playoff sooner rather than later.
I wonder how much the conference titles mattered? What I mean is, do you think the new format will pretty much exclude a non-conference champion SEC team in the future.
I hope that we get to an eight team playoff sooner rather than later.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:22 am to higgs_boson
As soon as Alabama is Number 5
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:25 am to higgs_boson
If after 12 regular games, plus conference championship weekend, you're only ranked 8th..you don't deserve a title shot. 6 is the absolute MAX it should ever go to IMO.
I also think a committee is unncecessary, and should just keep the BCS and take the top 4 (or 6) teams.
I also think a committee is unncecessary, and should just keep the BCS and take the top 4 (or 6) teams.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:29 am to higgs_boson
I honestly think it will take a few years. Before anything changes we will have to get through a full cycle (so have all 6 of the New Years 6 Bowls host a semifinal). So that is at least two more seasons after this one (playoffs 1/1/2017 should finish one rotation) at the earliest.
You would also have to figure out how to handle the quarterfinal games - will they be bowls or on campus? What is the timing? If on campus, would they be this weekend, as to not step on the toes of the bowl games (and would the 4 losing teams still go bowling?) If you are doing them as bowls, which four bowls get elevated to that level and when would they be played as to give enough time between the quarters and semis on 1/1, but still not interfere with Christmas. Also, if you elevate those four bowls, what happens to the tie ins to the conferences that you have just removed?
You would also have to figure out how to handle the quarterfinal games - will they be bowls or on campus? What is the timing? If on campus, would they be this weekend, as to not step on the toes of the bowl games (and would the 4 losing teams still go bowling?) If you are doing them as bowls, which four bowls get elevated to that level and when would they be played as to give enough time between the quarters and semis on 1/1, but still not interfere with Christmas. Also, if you elevate those four bowls, what happens to the tie ins to the conferences that you have just removed?
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:35 am to higgs_boson
What if they expand to 6 teams. This ensures that the power 5 is represented with one at large team from any conference.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:39 am to higgs_boson
8 is too many. Does MSST and MichST really deserve to play for a national championship? That would devalue the regular season way to much.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 8:49 am to higgs_boson
Never. There were only three teams this year, why expand to eight to justify the fourth entry.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 9:20 am to higgs_boson
When more than one Big 5 conference gets left out of the playoff (i.e., one Big 5 conference gets two teams in), the push will start.
In any given year, I believe people can deal with one pissed off conference. Two pissed off conferences make allies, though.
In any given year, I believe people can deal with one pissed off conference. Two pissed off conferences make allies, though.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 9:24 am to higgs_boson
8 is perfect and an opportunity for universities to host playoff games at home. The only bad part is that its extra games (for players, this could be a problem) and what will happen to the bowl sites. I'm not really high on what would happen if they extended it to 8, but I would love to see the atmosphere at say Jordan Hare or Bryant-Denny if a team like Ohio State or Baylor came to their stadium for a playoff game. Not only that, the extra $$$ the cities and universities get.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 9:55 am to higgs_boson
Perfect example this year. Michigan State, sitting at 8, has already lost to two of the top four teams. They have no business being in the discussion. Period. End of story.
2 teams having a bye is too much of an advantage, so no to a 6 team playoff.
If you go to 6, then #7 and 8 will bitch. If you go to 8, then #9 and #10 will bitch. Someone will always bitch. Keep it at 4, let #5 and 6 bitch, but at least you have four teams that are truly worthy of playing for a national championship.
2 teams having a bye is too much of an advantage, so no to a 6 team playoff.
If you go to 6, then #7 and 8 will bitch. If you go to 8, then #9 and #10 will bitch. Someone will always bitch. Keep it at 4, let #5 and 6 bitch, but at least you have four teams that are truly worthy of playing for a national championship.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:08 am to higgs_boson
Seems like, to me anyway, expanding to 8 teams is a little unfair to the teams that go through a guantlet of regular season play (i.e. anyone in the SEC) just to get to their CCG, and then have to play 2 extra games, risk injuries, etc., against teams from weaker conferences, (or against teams that shouldn't be there in the first place), just to get to the NCG.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:10 am to higgs_boson
System is fine. Do we really want the teams that would have been in contention for the 7th and 8th spots to be in the playoffs?
Posted on 12/10/14 at 10:35 am to higgs_boson
4 teams is plenty. The "new money" schools like TCU and Baylor need to go undefeated if they want to make the cut.
Posted on 12/10/14 at 11:19 am to higgs_boson
quote:
I hope that we get to an eight team playoff sooner rather than later.
Downvote
Posted on 12/10/14 at 1:48 pm to higgs_boson
I hope never.
Fans are so worried about 5-8 they don't care about screwing over 1-4.
I'm all for rewarding the teams at the top and rewarding a great regular season.
A large playoff ruins the regular season.
Games like last year's Iron Bowl would have been meaningless except for seeding.
This years' SEC championship would have meant nothing as Alabama could have lost and still gotten a birth.
The playoff needs to be small enough that every game matters and a single loss can eliminate you.
In an 8 team playoff that's not true, if you're #1 you're not falling out of the top 8 in a single game.
Falling out of the top 4 in a single game is always in the cards, which makes every game super critical.
Fans are so worried about 5-8 they don't care about screwing over 1-4.
I'm all for rewarding the teams at the top and rewarding a great regular season.
A large playoff ruins the regular season.
Games like last year's Iron Bowl would have been meaningless except for seeding.
This years' SEC championship would have meant nothing as Alabama could have lost and still gotten a birth.
The playoff needs to be small enough that every game matters and a single loss can eliminate you.
In an 8 team playoff that's not true, if you're #1 you're not falling out of the top 8 in a single game.
Falling out of the top 4 in a single game is always in the cards, which makes every game super critical.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News