Started By
Message
re: We don't need 8 teams in the playoff, we need four balanced conferences
Posted on 12/7/14 at 8:21 am to Crimson Legend
Posted on 12/7/14 at 8:21 am to Crimson Legend
5 conference champs and 3 top-rated non-conference champs determined by BCS formula.
Goodbye committee.
If you're on the bubble of #8/#9/#10:
-- You're lucky to be there if you make it,
-- If you don't make it, you don't have an argument.
So simple, a 'tard can understand it.
Goodbye committee.
If you're on the bubble of #8/#9/#10:
-- You're lucky to be there if you make it,
-- If you don't make it, you don't have an argument.
So simple, a 'tard can understand it.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:25 am to rmftrtr
quote:
5 conference champs and 3 top-rated non-conference champs determined by BCS formula. Goodbye committee. If you're on the bubble of #8/#9/#10: -- You're lucky to be there if you make it, -- If you don't make it, you don't have an argument. So simple, a 'tard can understand it.
This times infinity
Posted on 12/7/14 at 9:55 am to rmftrtr
quote:
5 conference champs and 3 top-rated non-conference champs determined by BCS formula. Goodbye committee.
Why not just get rid of "formulas" altogether?
Re-organize to eight conferences, conference champs get in. No wildcards, no byes, no formulas, no mulligans. Use SOS for seeding.
Just straight up playoffs. Why are so many so scared of this concept? It just doesn't get any more fair than that.
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:13 am to rmftrtr
quote:
5 conference champs and 3 top-rated non-conference champs determined by BCS formula. Goodbye committee. If you're on the bubble of #8/#9/#10: -- You're lucky to be there if you make it, -- If you don't make it, you don't have an argument. So simple, a 'tard can understand it.
:IAgreeWithThis:
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News