Started By
Message
re: Bama and LSU and tDecline
Posted on 11/29/14 at 2:06 am to higgs_boson
Posted on 11/29/14 at 2:06 am to higgs_boson
Ole Miss had a great one, until LSU gm, when their lack of size and depth and injury set in, and as the heart of the schedule wore on, with Aub wearing them down(knew LSU softened em up, but would've loved UM vs Aub if not for the injuries, which I think were the difference in victory..didn't bet the gm),etc..
Ole Miss was a legit Natty Title contender, but size in the front 4 and front 7 on D, plus depth, wear-tear, squeezed the momentum out of their entire team, the O started sputtering after the LSU game as well.
Vegas had UM as co-chalk for the Natty Title the week leading into UM-LSU, and they weren't wrong to have them such.
P.S. As for HUNH/Spread, I think it screws with many Defensive players mindsets and psyches, in thinking that the O will always have their backs. Softens em up to working too often from a being bailed out mentality.
Ole Miss was a legit Natty Title contender, but size in the front 4 and front 7 on D, plus depth, wear-tear, squeezed the momentum out of their entire team, the O started sputtering after the LSU game as well.
Vegas had UM as co-chalk for the Natty Title the week leading into UM-LSU, and they weren't wrong to have them such.
P.S. As for HUNH/Spread, I think it screws with many Defensive players mindsets and psyches, in thinking that the O will always have their backs. Softens em up to working too often from a being bailed out mentality.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 2:19 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News