Started By
Message
re: CFB Playoff Resumes using Sagarin & ESPN FPI
Posted on 11/18/14 at 9:15 am to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 11/18/14 at 9:15 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Problem is their 2 losses are so bad.
Yea, if we had managed to not completely frick up against Florida we'd be sitting REALLY pretty right about now.
2
Posted on 11/18/14 at 9:16 am to gatorhata9
quote:
Yea, if we had managed to not completely frick up against Florida we'd be sitting REALLY pretty right about now.
Yep, be shaping up for 2011 Part 2 in the Dome for sure.
You can probably take 1 bad loss to 6-6 team, but not 2.
This post was edited on 11/18/14 at 9:17 am
Posted on 11/18/14 at 9:40 am to gatorhata9
It will be interesting to see how the committee weighs good wins vs. bad losses. I'd love to know if this has been explicitly discussed by the members. Not sure I can really make a conclusion based on the current rankings. But I'm sure this has been discussed on here before?
Really begs the question of whether you buy into teams who seem to "play-up" to their level of competition/circumstances.
I'm sure it's UGA's recent history that has biased me into thinking that the quality of opponents in wins should be weighted more highly than the quality of opponents in losses
Really begs the question of whether you buy into teams who seem to "play-up" to their level of competition/circumstances.
I'm sure it's UGA's recent history that has biased me into thinking that the quality of opponents in wins should be weighted more highly than the quality of opponents in losses
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News