Started By
Message

re: Rommel Vs Patton

Posted on 11/14/14 at 5:22 pm to
Posted by Jma313
Member since Aug 2010
5157 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 5:22 pm to
if both were left alone and allowed to do their jobs (win wars) it would have been very interesting. Rommel still bit on the bait near Pas De Calais and left the majority of his tanks and veteran troops in that region of France for weeks after we invaded Normandy. Huge blunder right there…much more glaring then Pattons largest mistake (the Italian campaign). I would take patton tho into combat.
Posted by civilag08
Member since Feb 2011
806 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:50 pm to
Rommel actually studied Guderian anyway. He was a survivor in the North African Campaign in the compeittion for gaining a strong foothold and control for much of the world's oil. He was able to win in situations he was not supposed to win. The British Navy basically controlled the Mediterranean Sea and the German supply route to North Africa, destroying almost all of his German re-supplies.

He lived on the front with his soldiers who had to become a jack of all trades and innovate ways to keep his track armor vehicles running and protected all the while rationing water and food supplies. Capture british offices complained they were being mistreated because they were only give a liter a water a day at one point, the same amount he allocated to himself and his own soldiers. His use of anti-aircraft weapons decimated the allies armor vehicles some of which he captured and used against them. He was eventually driven out of North Africa once the British under Montgomery finally started to figure out his tactics.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter