Started By
Message
re: Catholic couple fined $13,000 for refusing to host same-sex ‘wedding’
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:21 pm to Patton
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:21 pm to Patton
The laws dictating this are the same ones that would punish them if they refused to allow interracial couples to be married on their land.
That doesn't mean I agree with this, but people need to stop acting like this is some "gay agenda".
That doesn't mean I agree with this, but people need to stop acting like this is some "gay agenda".
8
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:25 pm to Roger Klarvin
I normally side libertarianly with you but I disagree whole heartedly.
Nobody is suing because they won't hold an interracial marriage. Name the last time somebody was sued for discriminating on race.
The gays could have told them "FU, you bigot" and taken their business elsewhere, but instead sued. It is an agenda.
Nobody is suing because they won't hold an interracial marriage. Name the last time somebody was sued for discriminating on race.
The gays could have told them "FU, you bigot" and taken their business elsewhere, but instead sued. It is an agenda.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:26 pm to Roger Klarvin
Why aren't the owners' religious beliefs being protected? I'm all for gay marriage but this is pretty dumb. Sounds like this couple was just fishing for cash.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:31 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The laws dictating this are the same ones that would punish them if they refused to allow interracial couples to be married on their land.
That law too is bullshite.
Why should you have to allow anyone to get married on your land?
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:38 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The laws dictating this are the same ones that would punish them if they refused to allow interracial couples to be married on their land.
I'm no supporter (or opponent) of gay marriage, but this is correct.
quote:
people need to stop acting like this is some "gay agenda".
I disagree here.
As someone in an interracial marriage, if someone had had an issue with the locale my wife and I had chosen for our wedding, we would have just flipped 'em off and found a different spot we liked.
Suing takes the focus off the marriage and makes it about making a statement. Justified or no, the fact that this couple is willing to go this route and allow something else to take precedent over what is supposed to be their day of wedded bliss does indeed take it into the "agenda" realm, in my book.
Posted on 11/10/14 at 5:56 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
people need to stop acting like this is some "gay agenda".
what?
Posted on 11/10/14 at 6:01 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
but people need to stop acting like this is some "gay agenda".
They gay agenda is to PIIYB
Posted on 11/11/14 at 10:13 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The laws dictating this are the same ones that would punish them if they refused to allow interracial couples to be married on their land.
That doesn't mean I agree with this, but people need to stop acting like this is some "gay agenda".
Holy shite. Being black is not the same as being gay. Gonna start shite with this liberal board here, but you are born black, you are not born gay.
These people should allowed to refuse service to anyone for any reason and should refuse to pay this. It is the government overstepping it's bounds, they trying to force these people to do something that is deeply offensive to them, but yet you see no problem with that simply because the fairies got their way.
Posted on 11/11/14 at 4:03 pm to Roger Klarvin
" Their land" They should be able to refuse anything that they don't want happening there.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News