Started By
Message
re: THE NCAA...
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:52 pm to Broncothor
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:52 pm to Broncothor
The article comparing the handling of the Gurley and Winston issues would be a lot better if it didn't include factual errors.
The article states that there were allegations of improper benefits related to both players. In Winston's case no allegation has been made that he was paid for the more than 2,000 authenticated items he signed. I think almost everyone would bet that Jameis got paid but there wasn't an allegation.
The article says that Jameis only missed one half but he actually was suspended for the whole Clemson game.
In spite of the errors what really stinks is the way FSU handled the rape allegations. Mark Richt would never be a party to something like that.
The article states that there were allegations of improper benefits related to both players. In Winston's case no allegation has been made that he was paid for the more than 2,000 authenticated items he signed. I think almost everyone would bet that Jameis got paid but there wasn't an allegation.
The article says that Jameis only missed one half but he actually was suspended for the whole Clemson game.
In spite of the errors what really stinks is the way FSU handled the rape allegations. Mark Richt would never be a party to something like that.
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News