Started By
Message
re: Is there a legitimate reason that Ole Miss uses turf on their field than grass?
Posted on 10/6/14 at 2:13 pm to Bought a Snead Jerse
Posted on 10/6/14 at 2:13 pm to Bought a Snead Jerse
didnt say you were, but the only legitimate reasons for a team to not use grass is if there is a reason why grass isnt feasible. Ole Miss is in the middle of the black soiled (racist?), fertile as frick south. Shouldnt be any reason to not be able to grow grass
3
Posted on 10/6/14 at 2:17 pm to ThaKaptin
We may replace with Kudzu.
Posted on 10/6/14 at 2:22 pm to ThaKaptin
quote:
Shouldnt be any reason to not be able to grow grass
Okay so maybe we can grow the greenest, tallest, most fertile fricking grass this side of the Mississippi but just have a preference for field turf. Who cares?
And do you have any stats on turf injuries versus grass injuries or is this just pure gump speculation? Here, let me help you out...
LINK
quote:
A 2010 study looking at collegiate football injuries showed that FieldTurf may actually be safer than natural grass for injuries in general.
This post was edited on 10/6/14 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 10/6/14 at 2:40 pm to ThaKaptin
this is how Tdeclines start, you blame outside forces for losses
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News