re: Banland #free[insertyourhandlehere]

Posted on 9/29/14 at 6:57 pm to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer

Posted by PowerTool

The dark side of the road

Member since Dec 2009

21268 posts

Posted on 9/29/14 at 6:57 pm to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer

quote:
Posted by WhiskerBiscuitSlayer You don't seem to understand tRant. Think about it as TexAgs' Old Rivalries board on meth.

That was never the point of the SEC rant. Not everyone shares your obsession with the old Rivalries board.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by cokebottleag

I’m a Santos Republican

Member since Aug 2011

24028 posts

Posted on 9/29/14 at 7:47 pm to PowerTool

The rant is nothing like old rivalries. I hate that board, it's realistically 99% aggies laughing at the sips and Baylor, making pointed personal attacks at each other, and a handful of obvious alters pretending to be sips.

The rant is a lot more even, limits the personal attacks, is very funny, and sometimes clever if you can keep your jimmies unrustled. I don't go to the rant for discussion; if I wanted reasoned debate I go to a team board and have a nice polite conversation where I can say I think someone's coach or RB sucks and not get banned from the site for it. The rant is just rambunctious fun. It's probably the best neutral ground for college sports I've found.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by WhiskerBiscuitSlayer

Member since Jan 2013

13842 posts

Posted on 9/30/14 at 12:04 am to PowerTool

quote:
That was never the point of the SEC rant. Not everyone shares your obsession with the old Rivalries board.

Wow, you guys are feisty today. I never gave my opinion on what "the point" of tRant was. I'm pretty sure it was to keep all of the other teams posters from trolling the Tiger Rant.