Started By
Message

Is the playoff going to hurt the SEC?

Posted on 9/15/14 at 7:55 pm
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
16144 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 7:55 pm
I can see it being nearly impossible to go undefeated now with the balance of power. The playoff is going to favor weaker undefeated teams. Like BYU going undefeated. No way in Hell they do that playing weekly in the SEC. Let an ACC team go undefeated, a PAC 12 and a Big 10 team like PSU that sucks balls. There is no way a 1 loss SEC team gets in but I know a 1 loss SEC team beats those 4 every time.
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15445 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 7:56 pm to
It'll all work it's way out after the first round.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86556 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 7:56 pm to
Previous years there were 2 teams vying for a title.

Now there are 4.

It may or may not help, but I dont' see how it hurts.
Posted by RagingCajun3195
Fort Worth
Member since Aug 2014
2014 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 7:57 pm to
TBH I don't see a SEC team making it this year.
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 7:57 pm
Posted by Flame Salamander
Texas Gulf - Clear Lake
Member since Jan 2012
3044 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 8:01 pm to
The Computers really helped the SEC. Taking away the Computers will hurt the SEC.
Posted by Big Moe
Chicago
Member since Feb 2013
3989 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 8:05 pm to
Like the poster above said, the only scenario I see the SEC being left at home is with a Notre Dame team having a great year. Even then you would need a couple undefeated conference champs
Posted by carolinaswamper
unincorporated swamp, johns island,
Member since Jan 2013
3142 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:21 pm to
youll never see an all sec championship game. one only from the conference.
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:33 pm to
They should've gone +2 to start with for the playoffs. The Top 8 teams. You could even work in something where the Power5 Champions are represented and then 3 At Large/Wild Card teams.

Of course then we'd have 3 SEC Teams in the Playoffs every year, and the other conferences would be pissed off. However, that provide for a more honest playoff that actually has the best teams.
This post was edited on 9/15/14 at 9:34 pm
Posted by Rebel Land Shark
Member since Jul 2013
30175 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 9:39 pm to
The SEC will get someone in.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42688 posts
Posted on 9/15/14 at 10:34 pm to
Given that strength of schedule no longer matters, I think there's a very good chance that it will. I also think that combined with the push for supposed P5 matchups/P5 superiority, it may well wind up killing off a lot of marquee OOC matchups instead of increasing them. Teams will schedule the Wake Forrests of the world and that will be enough. Why schedule a good team when you can schedule a team that simply has the right membership?

The BCS had unbiased computers to weight who you played and who you lost two against the opinions of polls which rely a great deal on last year or even year's of reputation and simple Ws and Ls - those alogrithims checked the quality of a win or a loss and balanced things against popular opinion/polls. Humans simply don't operate that way and ultimately the selection committee will be under pressure to represent multiple conferences regardless of more unbiased ways of selecting teams as well as under pressure to select teams multiple tv markets -- and don't think catering to more eyeballs on tv sets won't influence selections because it will.

Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19257 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 4:23 am to
quote:

I can see it being nearly impossible to go undefeated now with the balance of power. The playoff is going to favor weaker undefeated teams. Like BYU going undefeated. No way in Hell they do that playing weekly in the SEC. Let an ACC team go undefeated, a PAC 12 and a Big 10 team like PSU that sucks balls. There is no way a 1 loss SEC team gets in but I know a 1 loss SEC team beats those 4 every time.


I assume you're talking in generalities and not specifically about this year. I'd be stunned in the B1G produces an undefeated team.

Otherwise, I agree with you. Especially since each division appears balanced within itself.

It's why going to a 9 game schedule, at this time, would be insanity. You'd just be increasing the odds of NOT producing an undefeated or one loss team, while the B1G's fatten up on in-conference cupcakes.

It's also why these cross-conference Power 5 games are hugely important. It'll be the only way to prove to the committee that SEC quality is light years ahead of these dogmeats.

The real wild card, however, will be Notre Dame. You know the committee will bend over backward to include them.
Posted by BearBait09
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
2307 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 7:48 am to
Until the committee actually shows us what it thinks by releasing inseason standings, it's silly to make assumptions about how SoS will be treated. I think it is most likely the committee will want to avoid rocking the boat, and their rankings will not be significantly different than the polls, but it also wouldn't surprise me if Baylor was a good 5-10 spots lower than in the polls as a statement against our nonconference schedule. A&M could see this kind of backlash also. As the season continues both schools would see their SoS go up a lot, and at this point I don't see how an undefeated Baylor or an 1-2 SEC champ A&M (or any other SEC team) doesn't end up easily in the playoffs. BYU is another matter. Notre Dame has a good schedule and would deserve consideration if they did well.

It's gonna become clearer, what was it? week 12 last year and 4 teams were still undefeated?

At this point, with the big10 self destructing and the Pac12/ACC both making their premier programs look vulnerable the SEC already looks as likely to get two teams in as it is 1, and zero teams in is inconceivable. If Auburn knocks off K-State this thursday, the SEC will be the only conference to get to conference play without having a loss in a game they weren't heavy dogs in.
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57942 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 7:49 am to
I think a playoff doesn't help to its fullest until t he playoff is expanded to 8 teams. No way in hell that AT LEAST the SEC champ is included in the top 8 teams.
Posted by Cockeee Don
Myrtle Beach, SC
Member since Jul 2014
690 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 8:05 am to
yes.
Posted by MizBob
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2012
1149 posts
Posted on 9/16/14 at 10:38 am to
I would like to see them do away with conference championships and expand the playoffs to 8 teams. You would probably get two or three sec teams in most years that way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter