Started By
Message
re: The Perfect Playoff System
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:57 am to Mulat
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:57 am to Mulat
quote:
Yes I agree, I think that is what Tiger Live2 was getting at. Ok so the top 8 conferences and 4 At-large
How say you to that Crimson Legend?
Very reasonable.
What do you do with the bottom 4 conferences? Give them criteria where they have to be considered as at-large?
2
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:36 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
What do you do with the bottom 4 conferences? Give them criteria where they have to be considered as at-large?
I think you and Tiger 2 may have a better handle on this than me, but what Tiger 2 is suggesting, I THINK
1. The Top 8 conferences would be ranked by an objective criteria, such as BCS with the computer algorithm (lets not get stuck here just yet, let me finish)
Then the At-Large would be ranked using the same Ranking Criteria, whatever was used to rank the Conferences. That I think means anyone could get in who may be from much smaller or less thought of conferences.
How now?
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:47 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
What do you do with the bottom 4 conferences? Give them criteria where they have to be considered as at-large?
2 conference champs would be left out. They can play a bowl, or go into pool of bowl teams like now.
Seeds 1-4 are the top ranked conference champs. Seeds 5-12, just go to best team. So like in 2011, LSU is the 1 seed, gets a bye,OSU 2 etc... Bama would be the 5 seed, play likely the 8th ranked conference champ(12th seed), in BDS. First 2 weeks are played at higher seed.
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 12:48 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News