Started By
Message

re: Who should be more concerned after close Game 1: Bama or LSU?

Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:09 am to
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:09 am to
LSU What was supposed to be the strength of the team was actually the biggest weakness.Both lines were dominated by an inferior team.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21125 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

LSU What was supposed to be the strength of the team was actually the biggest weakness.Both lines were dominated by an inferior team.


And in the 4th quarter, both of LSU's lines dominated Wisconsin.

Our inexperienced QB got MAJOR experience leading his team back from a 24-7 deficit at a neutral site against a ranked team in primetime.

Our totally green WRs stepped up with HUGE plays.

Our secondary is going to be ridiculously good, especially when Rashard Robinson comes back and Jamal Adams gets some experience.

As Quentin Thomas continues to recover and Bain gets back, the DT rotation will be better.

Porter is needed at center and his return will help.

Fournette will get better. He was timid. That will change.

A huge come from behind victory in the first game is a great experience for a very young team like LSU. They now know what they need to work on and they have a major confidence builder.

This went from a 6-6 team to a 9-3 team (at least) in the span of a quarter of play. What if the KEEP improving?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter