Started By
Message

re: Who should be more concerned after close Game 1: Bama or LSU?

Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:08 am to
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:08 am to
Bama doesn't really have much to be concerned about.

Well over 500 yards of offense.

We have a kicker now.

Our punter looks great. (Great Scott!)

Our defense didn't do that bad. The secondary did bad, and mostly Sylve. but someone other than Sylve out there and it looks a lot different. And yeah, they dropped a few passes, but so did Bama. We lost the TO battle and had more penalties than they did.

They only scored 16 points on offense. Don't forget they had a KO return for a TD. We gave up KO returns for TDs in the opener in 08 and 09 as well. They only had 1 offensive TD. We played them a lot better in the second half.

Get Eddie Jackson to 100% and replace Sylve, eventually work TB onto the field, and we'll be fine.
Posted by Futures Bleak
Member since Jun 2014
3545 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Bama doesn't really have much to be concerned about.


Your delusion is always good for a laugh
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50681 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Bama doesn't really have much to be concerned about.


I agree. The minor hiccups will be fixed by the Florida game.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95904 posts
Posted on 8/31/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Well over 500 yards of offense.
Not to troll, but WVU is maybe the worst defense in the last three years. Why they still run a 3-3-5 is beyond me. I swear Sims had 10 seconds to throw
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter