Who should be more concerned after close Game 1: Bama or LSU?

LSU our run D is garbage

A win is a win and neither team was playing FAU. (oh, for bama thats next week.)

Much improvement normally happens from week 1 to week 2.

Neither. Both will still be undefeated when they play each other. Both will win 10 games.

I think, from a coaching standpoint, this is a good thing. Both teams will improve. By the end of the year they will be peaking.

They say teams improve the most from Week 1 to Week 2. Week 1 just get the W.

LSU What was supposed to be the strength of the team was actually the biggest weakness.Both lines were dominated by an inferior team.

quote:

---

Who should be more concerned after close Game 1: Bama or LSU?

---

Both should be equally concerned.

Bama's pass D, and LSU's run D were both terrible.

Lsu by far. Alabama looked pretty good on o, just need to get a bit more efficient in the red zone, with 2 games to tune up. Of the concerning positions, only cb seems to be real concern, but we are without our best option at that position (jackson). I expect by the meat of the sec schedule the starters at cb will be different. There was some confusing between the lbs and the safeties caused by depriests absence, opened up some holes in the zone. The dline was in 3 man for a large part of the game, couldnt get much pressure against 5 (shockingly). Did much better when we switched to 4 man front. Sims was 100x better than everyone was predicting, accounted for over 300yds, accurate in the short and intermediate game, didnt take many shots downfield. Playcalling was quite good I thought, oline was great aside from some drive killing penalties. All in all I think we are in great shape

Push.

Bama IMHO if they keep playing soft defense. LSU's defense is young but talented and grew up a lot by the end of the game vs Whisky. Their CB's played man-to-man, loaded the box and finally shutdown a potent Badger running game.