Started By
Message
re: Should the SEC championship be charged from the east vs west
Posted on 8/30/14 at 1:04 am to fullOshot
Posted on 8/30/14 at 1:04 am to fullOshot
That is news to most of us. We thought the purpose was for the west champion to play the east champion. Can you link the SEC by law regarding the conference championship game to show where it states that the purpose is to match the two "best" teams?
1
Posted on 8/30/14 at 7:48 am to Dick Leverage
I saw an article written on why the SEC should go to 9 SEC games a year. It said that you keep 1 cross divisional rival, and then rotate the other 2 teams every year (from the other division). This way, the college player gets to play all the schools in the SEC during his 4 years of college.
So for UGA, we will keep Auburn as cross divisional rival, and then rotate on 2 other west teams every year. I love this idea b/c it ensures that the players get to play every team in the SEC if they stay for 4 years.
All SEC schools can cut out one of their weaker opponents or one of their tougher OOC team and replace them with another SEC school.
The only negative to this is that we could screw another SEC team out of the playoff w/ an extra SEC opponent compared to a cupcake team.
So for UGA, we will keep Auburn as cross divisional rival, and then rotate on 2 other west teams every year. I love this idea b/c it ensures that the players get to play every team in the SEC if they stay for 4 years.
All SEC schools can cut out one of their weaker opponents or one of their tougher OOC team and replace them with another SEC school.
The only negative to this is that we could screw another SEC team out of the playoff w/ an extra SEC opponent compared to a cupcake team.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News