Started By
Message

re: Dline or secondary- which was more disappointing?

Posted on 8/29/14 at 4:51 pm to
Posted by RoyalAir
Detroit
Member since Dec 2012
5896 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 4:51 pm to
Offense put up 35 points, had Jones held onto the ball. All this while knowing that they had to score a TD on every possession just to stay in the game. I really can't fault them too much.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 4:52 pm
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25878 posts
Posted on 8/30/14 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Offense put up 35 points, had Jones held onto the ball. All this while knowing that they had to score a TD on every possession just to stay in the game. I really can't fault them too much.


Yeah, the offense did fine I think and had to play from a 10+ point deficit almost the entire game.. that alone changes the game plan and forces us to into playing catch-up for far too long.

It was the secondary for me. The whole scheme was around a 3-4 defense so there were plenty of times when it was 3 DL vs 5 of their elite OL and sometimes an RB. That game plan alone was a disaster from the get go. With that said even on plays when A&M didn't need much time the secondary got blown up. They did nothing against screens and slants.
This post was edited on 8/30/14 at 5:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter