Started By
Message

Change for the better?

Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:44 am
Posted by bigdawg7780
SC
Member since Oct 2013
2793 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:44 am
Posted by bdv1974
Liberty, South Carolinananana
Member since Nov 2011
10593 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:51 am to
you dont have to be 300+ if you're strong and quick So maybe a good change
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 9:57 am to
They weren't good when they were the fattest OL in the SEC (and NCAA...and NFL) so I'd rather them try for fit OL.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:07 am to
Weight and size in general are positive aspects for OL if the player in question is in good shape and has the athletic ability to block opposing DL. If not, then the extra weight quickly becomes a liability. Apparently our coaches felt that we had too many linemen who could not effectively carry that much excess weight. We will see soon enough if our strategy pays off. If our OL starts getting bowled over then either the strategy failed or we simply haven't recruited well enough on the OL which I feel has been the case for some time now. Hopefully this new group can come together.
Posted by UGAporkchop
Loganville
Member since Feb 2014
129 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 10:27 am to
quote:

LINK /


Is this a trap?
Posted by samson'sseed
Augusta
Member since Aug 2013
2070 posts
Posted on 8/9/14 at 1:51 pm to
This is a big change in Richt's philosophy.

Usually, UGA has the biggest OLs.

The difference between 298 and 308 isn't that much. I wouldn't worry about a 10 pound difference.

Now, a 20 pound difference will matter. Teams that big will wear out defensive lines.

UGA won't be wearing defensive lines out, so their techniques better be good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter