Started By
Message
Grade your starting units so far
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:29 am
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:29 am
I'm just curious how ranters see their teams shaping up so far.
If you don't know the starter yet grade on who the starter will likely be. And in positions where there is typically a lot of rotation grade the depth chart as well.
A&M
QB: B+
RB: A
WR/TE: A
OL: A+
DL: B+
LB: B-
DB: C+
K: B+
P: A+
KR/PR: A+
If you don't know the starter yet grade on who the starter will likely be. And in positions where there is typically a lot of rotation grade the depth chart as well.
A&M
QB: B+
RB: A
WR/TE: A
OL: A+
DL: B+
LB: B-
DB: C+
K: B+
P: A+
KR/PR: A+
This post was edited on 8/6/14 at 7:41 am
16
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:31 am to Warrior Poet
QB - C+
RB - A+
WR - A-
TE - B
OL - B+
DL - A-
LB - B-
DB - B
RB - A+
WR - A-
TE - B
OL - B+
DL - A-
LB - B-
DB - B
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:32 am to Warrior Poet
Up to this point
QB: C
RB: B+
WR: A+
OL: C
DL: C+ (And Improving everyday)
LB: A
DB: B+
QB: C
RB: B+
WR: A+
OL: C
DL: C+ (And Improving everyday)
LB: A
DB: B+
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:32 am to Warrior Poet
Never seen this thread before 
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:33 am to Warrior Poet
there's no way SMU is that good
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:34 am to Warrior Poet
F at every position. we will be lucky to win a game
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:38 am to Warrior Poet
LSU
QB: B-
RB: A-
WR: B
TE: B+
OL: A
DE: A-
DT: B
LB: A-
DB: A
ST: A-
QB: B-
RB: A-
WR: B
TE: B+
OL: A
DE: A-
DT: B
LB: A-
DB: A
ST: A-
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:48 am to Warrior Poet
QB- B+
RB- B-
WR/TE - A
OL - B
DL - A+
LB- B+
DB- A+
RB- B-
WR/TE - A
OL - B
DL - A+
LB- B+
DB- A+
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:57 am to Warrior Poet
Bama
Coaching- a+
Qb- b-
Rb- a
Wr- a
Ol- b
Dl- a
Lb- a
S- a
Cb- b
St- F-
Coaching- a+
Qb- b-
Rb- a
Wr- a
Ol- b
Dl- a
Lb- a
S- a
Cb- b
St- F-
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:20 am to Warrior Poet
QB: B+
RB: A
WR/TE: B+
OL: A+
DL: B
LB: A
DB: B
ST: C+
RB: A
WR/TE: B+
OL: A+
DL: B
LB: A
DB: B
ST: C+
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:27 am to Warrior Poet
I don't understand how anyone with a new starter at QB could rate that player as anything above a C, or average.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:33 am to Warrior Poet
QB - I
RB - A
WR - I
TE - B-
OL - A+
DE - A-
DT - I
MLB - B
OLB - A
CB - A+
S - B+
K - A-
P - A++ (Australian)
RB - A
WR - I
TE - B-
OL - A+
DE - A-
DT - I
MLB - B
OLB - A
CB - A+
S - B+
K - A-
P - A++ (Australian)
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:50 am to Warrior Poet
QB- A-
RB- B+
WR- A
OL- A
DL- A
LB- B
DB- B
ST- ?
RB- B+
WR- A
OL- A
DL- A
LB- B
DB- B
ST- ?
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:19 am to Warrior Poet
quote:
A&M
QB: B+
RB: A
WR/TE: A
OL: A+
DL: B+
LB: B-
DB: C+
K: B+
P: A+
KR/PR: A+
SCAR has no chance.
Gotta prepare to face a B+ QB who has never played the college game before ... awesome.
A B+ DLine.
Hell, we were hoping y'all were going to be a little weak in those areas.
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:28 am to Warrior Poet
Arkansas
QB: D (until proven better, which could be)
RB: A (only question is who will step up at FB)
WR: C (Good young talent, Wilson back, Hatcher stepping up)
TE: A (At worst Henry 2nd best in conf., Derby may surprise, Sprinkle bigger,)
OL: B+ (Only reason not an A is question at center)
DL: B (Flowers and Philon, need depth to step up)
LB: C (Could be much better, have to prove it)
DB: D (New coaching could help, but got to see it)
K: C (New highly rated kicker, but Hocker hard to replace)
P: B+ (Versatile R or L rugby style Aussie)
KR/PR: C (K Marshall on KO should be good, PR up in air)
Just the way I see things right now.
QB: D (until proven better, which could be)
RB: A (only question is who will step up at FB)
WR: C (Good young talent, Wilson back, Hatcher stepping up)
TE: A (At worst Henry 2nd best in conf., Derby may surprise, Sprinkle bigger,)
OL: B+ (Only reason not an A is question at center)
DL: B (Flowers and Philon, need depth to step up)
LB: C (Could be much better, have to prove it)
DB: D (New coaching could help, but got to see it)
K: C (New highly rated kicker, but Hocker hard to replace)
P: B+ (Versatile R or L rugby style Aussie)
KR/PR: C (K Marshall on KO should be good, PR up in air)
Just the way I see things right now.
This post was edited on 8/6/14 at 9:32 am
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:56 am to Warrior Poet
QB: C- (poor play in '13, still no starter named)
RB: C+ (some depth, but largely unknown)
WR: C+ (Blue/Badet/Timmons is solid, but need to show improvment)
TE: D+ (JUCO kid and a true freshman - big question mark)
OL: C- (poor in '13, must show improvement)
DE: A- (good to great starters, some depth)
DT: C- (didn't look particularly good in spring but has depth)
LB: D (this group is going to struggle)
CB: C+ (good news - all of the '13 starters return; bad news - the starters in '13 were bad)
RB: C+ (some depth, but largely unknown)
WR: C+ (Blue/Badet/Timmons is solid, but need to show improvment)
TE: D+ (JUCO kid and a true freshman - big question mark)
OL: C- (poor in '13, must show improvement)
DE: A- (good to great starters, some depth)
DT: C- (didn't look particularly good in spring but has depth)
LB: D (this group is going to struggle)
CB: C+ (good news - all of the '13 starters return; bad news - the starters in '13 were bad)
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:57 am to Warrior Poet
quote:
A&M
QB: B+
RB: A
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News