Started By
Message

re: A retrospective look at Longhorn fans' initial reactions to the SEC Network

Posted on 8/7/14 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by Diggs
Member since Aug 2013
160 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Mississippi State, Vanderbilt and Kentucky


One of these is not like the others.
Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
13327 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 7:10 pm to
Yep 2 of the 3 have a National Championship to their name.
Posted by p_bubel
San Antonio
Member since Jan 2014
463 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 7:11 pm to
What I believe really got all this mess rolling was when Texas notified us originally that they were in negotiations to take the bulk of the Texas/Oklahoma teams to the Pac12; without even consulting us first... Seriously. Think about that for a second. That's insane.

That's the first time we started seriously talking to the SEC and got either cold feet or felt the deal to stay was good enough.

Colorado saw the way the wind was blowing and bolted to the PAC, Nebraska the BIG10.

We stayed another year with promises of Beebee bucks from Nebraska's and Colorado's payout and then we bolted for the SEC when the highschool crap on the LHN got around.

The Longhorns shopped themselves around for a bit, but the neither the BIG10 or Pac wants the LHN. For ESPN it was a cheap way to keep the status quo mainly in check. There are many hands in the cookie jar with the LHN payout and Texas Athletics currently gets only about 9 million, reportedly.

Now, the entire Big12 is crippled when it comes to putting together a viable conference channel and the already regional viewership has shrunk.

I'm so glad to be out.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 7:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter