Started By
Message
re: Would Florida be open to starting an OOC series against Auburn?
Posted on 7/30/14 at 12:37 pm to weagle99
Posted on 7/30/14 at 12:37 pm to weagle99
We need a 3-5.
No divisions. Three permanents so we keep rivalries, and then 5 rotating opponents each year. In four years everyone has played everyone home and away, and we get to keep our rivalries. There is no downside other than a potential rematch one week later in the SECCG, but that's hardly a downside as it'd probably be a good game.
No divisions. Three permanents so we keep rivalries, and then 5 rotating opponents each year. In four years everyone has played everyone home and away, and we get to keep our rivalries. There is no downside other than a potential rematch one week later in the SECCG, but that's hardly a downside as it'd probably be a good game.
3
Posted on 7/30/14 at 12:40 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
There is no downside other than a potential rematch one week later in the SECCG
The other downside is the possibility of having to break a two way tie between teams that did not play to determine who would go to Atlanta.
It may be worth it for a better schedule, though.
Posted on 7/30/14 at 12:44 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
I have a hard time getting behind something that gets rid of divisions it's not a bad idea though.
Posted on 7/30/14 at 2:11 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
No divisions.
quote:
There is no downside other than a potential rematch one week later in the SECCG
Divisions are a requirement for the SECCG. Given how wildly successful the SECCG has been, Slive will never get rid of divisions.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News