Started By
Message
Why is Missouri in the SEC East?
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:59 pm
Why can't they just put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?
Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
22
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:59 pm to boXerrumble
36-17
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:00 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
Why can't they just put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?
Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
Cause we aint changing shite around for shitty arse Mizzou
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:01 pm to boXerrumble
Because Bama wanted them there. When will yall get it?
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:02 pm to boXerrumble
(no message)
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:02 pm to boXerrumble
because of :rivalry:
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:02 pm to boXerrumble
Which ends, UT-Bama or Bama-Auburn?
Yeah, neither
Yeah, neither
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:03 pm to boXerrumble
Because frick Mizzou
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:04 pm to boXerrumble
Because Alabama was scared we would compete for the West
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:05 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
Why is Missouri in the SEC ?
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:07 pm to boXerrumble
Big Daddy Slive wanted his fellow Yankees to have the easiest possible path the the SECCG.
Hence Mizzou + SEC East.
This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:59 pm to boXerrumble
Geographically it would make more sense for Mizzou to play in West division, but makes even more sense for Texas to play in West. Both teams could not go to West, and no current West teams wanted to switch out. IMHO
Posted on 7/27/14 at 4:11 pm to boXerrumble
It drives me frickin crazy that Missouri is in the East. It's embarrassing, really.
I'm hoping at this point we just add an NC and a VA school, and put MO in the West and be done with the madness.
I'm hoping at this point we just add an NC and a VA school, and put MO in the West and be done with the madness.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 4:29 pm to boXerrumble
It is an outstanding question. I am very surprised that no one has ever brought this up before.
This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 7/27/14 at 6:44 pm to boXerrumble
Divisions are mostly geographic but also balanced for competition.
Look at the NFL or MLB and you'll see geographic oddities here and there too.
Look at the NFL or MLB and you'll see geographic oddities here and there too.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 7:21 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
Why can't they just put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?
Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
That is our SEC academics on full display for everyone. What's the problem?
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:01 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
boXerrumble
Why is Missouri in the SEC East?
Why can't they just put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?
Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
Because by doing that you're putting either the IB or TSIO @ risk of being eliminated.
Also, I personally don't think the SEC will ever split a state amongst 2 divisions (so no to TN/Vandy nor Aub./Ala. splitting). Besides, you have those in-state rivalry games to keep.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:06 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
Why is Missouri in the SEC East?
because Auburn fans would secretly miss playing LSU and cry everytime they ate a corndog.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:26 pm to boXerrumble
quote:
the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
Gumps killed over losing the Iron Bowl. I can't even imagine the massacre that would ensue if they lost the SECCG to Auburn.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:40 pm to boXerrumble
Move Mizzou and Vandy to the west, Alabama and Auburn to the east. You're welcome LSU.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News