Started By
Message
re: Lets talk dynasties
Posted on 7/19/14 at 1:00 pm to MontyFranklyn
Posted on 7/19/14 at 1:00 pm to MontyFranklyn
This is always a tricky topic. People define "greatest dynasties" with very different angles.
I think our average football teams since 2008 have likely been the most physically dominant and capable teams of all time. That would draw a shite ton of heat on the SEC rant because people do NOT want to admit to any active dynasty's fans something like that... ESPECIALLY us. Auburn/UT fans HATE us.. and LSU fans on this site are wildly aggressive towards us.
But humans have gotten faster and stronger as time goes on, and I also think as humans we have gotten better and better at football itself. If you put all of that AND the players Saban got on our teams, I believe with all I got that if money were on the line people would bet on our team vs the other team the majority of the time.
This exercise would require being able to take the 90's Nebraska teams at their peak and playing our teams at our peak. Since we don't have a time machine, we'll never know and it will always be a fun conversation... but I would absolutely take whatever team is widely considered our best team under Saban and put them against any ball club of years' past.
Where will ours rank if we snag 2 more before he retires? TWO more?! I gotta put it at the top of the list, bob.
I think our average football teams since 2008 have likely been the most physically dominant and capable teams of all time. That would draw a shite ton of heat on the SEC rant because people do NOT want to admit to any active dynasty's fans something like that... ESPECIALLY us. Auburn/UT fans HATE us.. and LSU fans on this site are wildly aggressive towards us.
But humans have gotten faster and stronger as time goes on, and I also think as humans we have gotten better and better at football itself. If you put all of that AND the players Saban got on our teams, I believe with all I got that if money were on the line people would bet on our team vs the other team the majority of the time.
This exercise would require being able to take the 90's Nebraska teams at their peak and playing our teams at our peak. Since we don't have a time machine, we'll never know and it will always be a fun conversation... but I would absolutely take whatever team is widely considered our best team under Saban and put them against any ball club of years' past.
Where will ours rank if we snag 2 more before he retires? TWO more?! I gotta put it at the top of the list, bob.
This post was edited on 7/19/14 at 1:02 pm
1
Posted on 7/19/14 at 1:24 pm to m2pro
I think it is fair to say the players today are bigger, stronger, and faster than ever before, and therefore it isn't really fair to say today's teams would beat previous years teams because it is unfair to older teams.
I think this question is really asking how dominant were those dynasties relative to their competition. Because we are able to dissect today's teams like never before, I feel that there will be a bias against recent teams.
I think this question is really asking how dominant were those dynasties relative to their competition. Because we are able to dissect today's teams like never before, I feel that there will be a bias against recent teams.
This post was edited on 7/19/14 at 5:05 pm
Page 1 of 1
Latest Alabama News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News