Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually believe this

Posted on 7/6/14 at 7:57 pm to
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

The only writer that's historical is Edit: Paul (Sorry), I think (And that one is a long shot). The rest are anonymous and appeared to have somewhat copied each other. Hardly historical.


I see you've edited it but, in the same, do you actually think the rest of the writers of the Bible, other than now Paul, were anonymous? This is mind-boggling to me.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

I see you've edited it but, in the same, do you actually think the rest of the writers of the Bible, other than now Paul, were anonymous? This is mind-boggling to me.



Read above, I just showed you that at least four of them. If you want, I can go ahead and show you the rest.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter