Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually believe this

Posted on 7/6/14 at 7:47 pm to
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

The difference is I believe in what I've seen work in my life and I have evidence to my satisfaction that while I may not understand it there is something to it. Maybe I could have stated it better but I don't write well so sue me.


And I understand that. I was very religious growing up and so I definitely empathize with feelings that have little explanation being sufficient for others.

Unfortunately, anecdotal evidence is oft times considered the worst kind.
Posted by Stacked
Member since Apr 2012
5675 posts
Posted on 7/6/14 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

The only writer that's historical is Edit: Paul (Sorry), I think (And that one is a long shot). The rest are anonymous and appeared to have somewhat copied each other. Hardly historical.


I see you've edited it but, in the same, do you actually think the rest of the writers of the Bible, other than now Paul, were anonymous? This is mind-boggling to me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter