Started By
Message
re: Jamal Peters- Safety - top 5
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:17 pm to Whereisomaha
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:17 pm to Whereisomaha
I think your coaching staff is slowly being exposed as reality in hitting now that the honeymoon is over. That's what I think.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:20 pm to SouthMSReb
quote:
Engie, why do you go back and edit posts to make yourself not look stupid.
Funny approach when you know you've been proven wrong about something.
I haven't "gone back and edited" shite. Not beyond a minute or so of the initial posting anyway which is generally for clarity or concision purposes -- in which case "if I said something stupid" you are an idiot for not quoting it.
But it's a pretty convenient allegation when you said something stupid on the front end and got called on it.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:21 pm to UMRealist
quote:
You said most of their success was in the first quarter. It wasn't. Sooo
Yes it was. Sooo
Just wondering how long you are going to continue to argue something that I've been right about the entire time? You could always allege that I'm "going back and editing" though. Seems to be the popular approach.
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:46 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
To be fair, that Boise QB was one of the worst decision makers I've ever seen. Great arm, but man he made some really poor reads.
Your pass defense was very vulnerable, their QB was rocking like an 80% completion rate at the half. Contrary to the apparent belief of some, INT's aren't the best measure of CB play. Yeah you have to take advantage of the poor decisions, but the biggest part of playing CB is forcing incompletions.
I agree the QB made some bad reads, but like I said earlier, if you go back and watch, majority of his completions were in the middle of the field 5 yards down. It really hurt not having Denzel or Birdman. And I wasn't really basing their play off the INTs, except I will say that Conner's and Golson's INTs were both NASTY.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:47 pm to engie
quote:
Your initial statement was "we were missing our top 3 linebackers".
quote:
Engie, pls. You know we were missing all 3 LB's.
Didn't say "top" Lbs
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:49 pm to engie
quote:
Gotta love giving CBs credit for 2S and 1DL int...
LOL @ you not watching the game. Conner was not playing a safety role.
quote:
This is why you are a fricking moron.
I wouldn't. It's an opinion. No way I would trade Webster for a senior Love.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:53 pm to engie
We were talking about rushing yards and then you try to throw in passing yards as well because you saw that they hardly had any rushing yards against us while Bird was in.
Then, later on, you edited it to make it seem like you were talking about passing yards as well...
Then, later on, you edited it to make it seem like you were talking about passing yards as well...
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:56 pm to engie
quote:
5* DE spends a spring and part of fall at TE
Because he only played TE during that time frame, right? Because we only have one TE, while a shitload of DE's...but frick that, Ward was a FIVE star. Can't try him out elsewhere. No way.
quote:
4* ATH that everyone knows only chance at a football future is at OL wasting a full year at QB/TE while you are ridiculously thin at OL
Oh, come on. Lane Johnson says shut the frick up and learn football.
quote:
3* diamond that surprised/impressed at CB back to WR leaving you ridiculously thin at corner.
Like Channing, how dare we spend a practice testing his WR skill. If he is as talented at WR as he is CB, why not have him rotate both sides? We are thin at depth on both sides.
I'll stop making sense and let you "throw some more shite against the wall"
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:05 pm to engie
quote:
When? You gave up 140 yards rushing to a team that couldn't throw the ball down the field.
You seriously know nothing about football. Keep reading your Gene's page shite and combining it with some Elite Dawgs.
quote:
How much time do you think you have to practice every day?
I guess you didn't play sports. Has an MSU player ever missed practice for being sick? Hurt? Oh, they have? THEY frickING SUCK NOW. They clearly lost everything by missing that one practice.
quote:
The kid still isn't seasoned as a corner. Funny people remember him "shutting down" Evans and Landry without remembering what De'Runnya did to him in the Egg Bowl once Dak was in...
Don't make me choke from laughing so hard. What did De'Runnya do to DJ? 45 yards in the game? LOL!
quote:
Also, link to where he's still on D and "just taking snaps"?
Also, link to where he is not on D and "permanently moved to WR?" LOL
quote:
Bottom line -- it's year 3. And you are still hodgepodging shite together like it was year 1. You told us CONSTANTLY under Mullen that there was no excuse to not have sufficient depth all across the field by year 3. And here you are one injury away from disaster at corner and OL and playing quite a few guys out of position in a manner that does not make sense.
What year is it for Mullen? HE ALMOST MISSED A BOWL GAME LAST YEAR. Freeze has a better portfolio already than Mullen.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:12 pm to engie
quote:
"Bird" was playing while Boise racked up the majority of their yards early. Hardly consequential he went stupid and got tossed.
You can't be serious?!?
First two drives:
21 yards - PUNT
33 yards - PUNT(Bird was ejected before they gained a yard on this drive)
I know you won't respond to this, since you are proven to be a complete idiot once again, but LOL @ you regardless. They didn't move the ball at all when Birdman was in. Can't wait for Birdman to be on a higher All-SEC team than McKinney, playing one less game.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:16 pm to engie
quote:
Hell, McKinney, Wells, and Beni didn't play in the second half -- so MSU was without all 3 starters too!11!1
Oh, perfect. Now we are comparing Southern Miss to Boise State.
Although, in your defense, USM is probably the best OOC game Mullen has ever scheduled, so I can understand why you would attempt the comparison. Even though we have scheduled Texas twice, Boise, and ULL during Freeze's short tenure.
quote:
And Dee Arrington is med RS while Gerri Green is RS as well -- so hell, we're without our top 5 linebackers now!11!1
Then who played LB in the second half? Throwing shite again, ehh?
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:18 pm to engie
quote:
Richie was one of 9 linebackers and 29 overall players on defense getting tackles in a shutout.
Love the inclusion of "shutout." About damn time. Only been a decade and a half.
#45-0
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:20 pm to engie
quote:
They had more success in two quarters combined than they did in one alone? Hold the damn phones!11!1
Boise by quarter:
1 - 116
2 - 86
3 - 77
First is still the most successful quarter.
Derp indeed.
Funny that you left out the 4th quarter. I wonder how many yards they had in the 4th.
Oh, 123 yards in the fourth. Ha, no shite, engie looks stupid again.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:28 pm to engie
quote:
Yes it was. Sooo
Just wondering how long you are going to continue to argue something that I've been right about the entire time? You could always allege that I'm "going back and editing" though. Seems to be the popular approach.
THESE ARE THE REASONS THAT UMREALIST IS RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG...AGAIN:
You said their most successful offensive quarter was the first. Here is why you are wrong:
1. Guess the one quarter that Boise failed to score in.
2. Guess the quarter that Boise turned the ball over the most.
3. Guess the quarter that Boise was stopped scoreless in the Red Zone.
Correct, the first quarter. Your argument is they had the most yards in the first quarter. This is a stupid fricking measurement, but nonetheless, it wasn't even the quarter that Boise had the most yards in.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:51 pm to REBEL5 AC
Just checking in to see if engie was still going full retard.
I'll see you guys later.
I'll see you guys later.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 4:23 pm to UMRealist
quote:
AC just went full DCReb
yolo
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News