Started By
Message
re: South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 am to mizzoukills
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 am to mizzoukills
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on. South Carolina does have a lot of potential as a program and wouldn't be surprised to see them take a chance on Chad Morris if Spurrier retires. This would do two things, give a big frick you to Clemson and take away Clemson's biggest recruiting tool. it would be a risk but the payoff could be huge.
2
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:57 am to Warfarer
quote:
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on
I think it's funny that they've been solid for 3-4 years and all of the sudden they now have incredible potential, yet Mizzou has been extremely solid and at times damn near elite for 10+ years and we have zero potential.
Laughably retarded.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:00 am to Warfarer
quote:
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on
So how many teams in cfb are elite, like 20? Elite is just that..elite. Best of the best. Cream of the crop.
From 2011-2013 bama has been elite. Oregon has been up there. I'm sure a few others.
Carolina in that time frame has zero BCS bowls, zero SEC titles, and zero division titles. In fact, all they do have in that time frame is a few bowl wins. You are off your rocker if you think a team that hasn't won a damn thing of consequence can be considered "elite", by any measure.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News