Started By
Message
South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:46 am
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:46 am
They've been an above average program for about 4 years.
Before 2010, what was the overall status of their football program? Poor, decent, good, or great? Considering their overall history, I'd rank their program pre-2010 as somewhere between poor and decent with rare flashes of good.
You may wonder where I'm going with this. I keep reading on the rant that after Spurrier leaves, South Carolina will surely hire a superstar coach because people across this country now see the "potential" of the South Carolina program.
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
Don't you think that SCar needs to prove themselves a bit more before we can jump to that conclusion?
:nb4freerentinyourheadcomments:
:nb4cocksessed:
:nb4anythingcommentbyscrewster:
:nb4fieldgoalgif:
:nb4cocksownMizzou:
:nb4SECChampionshipgamedoesn'tmatter...webeatyou:
:nb4you'retheworstposteronthissite:
:nb4howhaveyounotbeenbannedyet?:
:nb4CockBlockit'sunoriginalyetpredictableresponse:
:nb4weinyourhead:
Before 2010, what was the overall status of their football program? Poor, decent, good, or great? Considering their overall history, I'd rank their program pre-2010 as somewhere between poor and decent with rare flashes of good.
You may wonder where I'm going with this. I keep reading on the rant that after Spurrier leaves, South Carolina will surely hire a superstar coach because people across this country now see the "potential" of the South Carolina program.
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
Don't you think that SCar needs to prove themselves a bit more before we can jump to that conclusion?
:nb4freerentinyourheadcomments:
:nb4cocksessed:
:nb4anythingcommentbyscrewster:
:nb4fieldgoalgif:
:nb4cocksownMizzou:
:nb4SECChampionshipgamedoesn'tmatter...webeatyou:
:nb4you'retheworstposteronthissite:
:nb4howhaveyounotbeenbannedyet?:
:nb4CockBlockit'sunoriginalyetpredictableresponse:
:nb4weinyourhead:
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:52 am
15
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:47 am to mizzoukills
They are historically one of the worst programs in college football. They've been OK since Holtz got there.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:49 am to mizzoukills
Why do you start so many threads?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:50 am to mizzoukills
quote:
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
No. An emerging SEC power.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:51 am to mizzoukills
They're Baylor with a penis mascot
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 am to mizzoukills
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on. South Carolina does have a lot of potential as a program and wouldn't be surprised to see them take a chance on Chad Morris if Spurrier retires. This would do two things, give a big frick you to Clemson and take away Clemson's biggest recruiting tool. it would be a risk but the payoff could be huge.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:06 am to mizzoukills
Is it just me, or have there been a lot of threads about SC recently?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:22 am to mizzoukills
quote:
South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
3 straight ll wins seasons, I'd say South Carolina has been elite since 2010. ONe bad break per year has held them back. This year that bad break is playing Auburn.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:30 am to mizzoukills
Still mad I see...
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:37 am to mizzoukills
This is your 2nd thread on South Carolina in 24 hours.
I'd rather have our last four years over Missouri's last four years.
I'd rather have our last four years over Missouri's last four years.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:45 am to mizzoukills
Yeah they have been a good program. Very very good to their standards because their program was horrible before Holtz was there. They just haven't taken the next step in being an SEC champion. Waiting to see this.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:19 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Mizzou board
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:28 pm to mizzoukills
quote:I would rather be in South Carolina's position post-Spurrier than Mizzou's post-Pinkel. Y'all are fricked when Pinkel hangs it up.
You may wonder where I'm going with this. I keep reading on the rant that after Spurrier leaves, South Carolina will surely hire a superstar coach because people across this country now see the "potential" of the South Carolina program.
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 1:14 pm to mizzoukills
wow, another USC post from mizzoufails :beatdeadhorse:
I'm so glad I'm not a mizzou fan.
I'm so glad I'm not a mizzou fan.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 4:11 pm to mizzoukills
South Carolina is a really good program right now. I think there are a lot of similarities between Mizzou and South Carolina since Pinkel and Holtz-Spurrier arrived respectively.
I think most of the shenanigans started after they beat us last year and went on tilt with the trolling/threads. With each following week more trolling over "Mizzou is gonna lose to "x" team this week allowing South Carolina to win the East." When that didn't happen and Mizzou won the East the tables were turned and the trolling reciprocated the relationship between the fans here on the SECr is where it is today. One thing is clear to those that are trying to be honest and were paying attention, the first shots across the bow were fired by the fans sporting garnett and black.
Its a vicious cycle but it makes the SECr fun so it is what it is.
I think most of the shenanigans started after they beat us last year and went on tilt with the trolling/threads. With each following week more trolling over "Mizzou is gonna lose to "x" team this week allowing South Carolina to win the East." When that didn't happen and Mizzou won the East the tables were turned and the trolling reciprocated the relationship between the fans here on the SECr is where it is today. One thing is clear to those that are trying to be honest and were paying attention, the first shots across the bow were fired by the fans sporting garnett and black.
Its a vicious cycle but it makes the SECr fun so it is what it is.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 5/30/14 at 7:11 am to mizzoukills
Has mizzzzzou beaten USC since joining the SEC?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News