Started By
Message

re: KC-STL: Tale of Two Cities

Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:58 am to
Posted by Stlox
Maryland Heights, MO
Member since Jul 2013
795 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Metro area sizes are getting close. Overall, KC is growing ever so slightly faster than St. Louis, but St. Louis is still larger. Metro areas: KC is 2.2 million, St. Louis is 2.8 million.


I was surprised by your numbers. You're a little off. StL is 2.8 and KC is 2.0.

But I would agree, the growth rate is higher in KC. This is my beef with "old money" vs. "new money". "New money" adds growth and "old money" doesn't. Things remain the same, KC will pass StL.
Posted by MizzouJim
Member since Nov 2013
419 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 11:42 am to
quote:

I was surprised by your numbers. You're a little off. StL is 2.8 and KC is 2.0.


Are we really going to argue this? You completely missed my point if you are. The KC area includes the county which has St. Joseph as part of the metro area (it is near the airport, and part of the metroplex) That gets us to the 2.2 million I cited.

However, Kansas City's actual CSA is even higher (St. Louis' CSA slightly more). St. Louis CSA is 2.9 million, and KC's is 2.4 million.

LINK

Regarding the debate about new vs old money I think may be deceptive. Even if KC is growing slightly faster, both cities are entreprenurial and growing new businesses which by definition become new money. What is indisputable is that St. Louis is a much older city and therefore has more household "name" companies than its younger counterpart.

I want both cities to thrive and that means attracting young people and innovative companies.

Both cities have much to recommend them, and people I talk to from either coast are often surprised by the culture and diversity that both cities present.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter