Started By
Message
KC-STL: Tale of Two Cities
Posted on 5/16/14 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 5/16/14 at 4:32 pm
LINK
The video in the link is very Micheal Sam, skip it.
Click on the images below it, each subject compares something from StL and KC.
The video in the link is very Micheal Sam, skip it.
Click on the images below it, each subject compares something from StL and KC.
This post was edited on 5/16/14 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 5/16/14 at 6:46 pm to Sleeping Tiger
I live in KC now but I'm from Sedalia. I do not understand the city rivalry in any way. Growing up I went to both for weekend fun. There are pros and cons to both. But it seems like the cities spend so much time fighting eachother or fighting kansas that both end up slipping and losing buisness and conventions to Indianapolis and similar cities.
Posted on 5/19/14 at 12:27 am to Sleeping Tiger
So essentially under the dialect section, one can conclude that the western side of the state speaks more similarly with southern speech patterns and St. Louis talks like a bunch of damn Yankees....just as I thought
FWIW, I'm a geography/map nerd, and I've always been fascinated how different Missourians talk. I can pick out someone from St. Louis just by talking to them for 30 seconds. Southern Missouri is also identifiable, although Springfield speech patterns are pretty identical to Kansas City.
FWIW, I'm a geography/map nerd, and I've always been fascinated how different Missourians talk. I can pick out someone from St. Louis just by talking to them for 30 seconds. Southern Missouri is also identifiable, although Springfield speech patterns are pretty identical to Kansas City.
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:00 am to Sleeping Tiger
I grew up in KC, went to Mizzou, then moved to St. Louis and have lived here for over 30yrs.
St. Louis refuses to acknowledge KC, and competes with Chicago. But truth be known, Chicago refuses to acknowledge St. Louis.
So KC has short-man syndrome towards St. Louis, and St. Louis has short-man syndrome to Chicago.
I have likes and hates of both towns.
KC is more progressive, has more "new money", and was smart to grab as much of Jackson and Clay county for the City.
St. Louis is bigger, has more to do and I prefer the location closer east.
The bad thing about KC is stares out to the barren wasteland to the west.
The bad thing about StL is the "old money". That is, StL was the 4th largest city in US, 110yrs ago and falling ever since. "Old money" are people that have made their money and cashed out, living on their portfolios. St. Louis is also mired in these little fiefdom towns that spend most efforts trying to steal another fiefdom's business than working together to bring in out of area business.
KC is western. Hearing "Howdy" is common. You'd never hear that in StL.
StL is eastern. You'll hear "Soda", instead of "Pop". Plus, apparently we think all Indianians are white trash. Only place you will hear white trash referred to as "Hoosiers".
St. Louis refuses to acknowledge KC, and competes with Chicago. But truth be known, Chicago refuses to acknowledge St. Louis.
So KC has short-man syndrome towards St. Louis, and St. Louis has short-man syndrome to Chicago.
I have likes and hates of both towns.
KC is more progressive, has more "new money", and was smart to grab as much of Jackson and Clay county for the City.
St. Louis is bigger, has more to do and I prefer the location closer east.
The bad thing about KC is stares out to the barren wasteland to the west.
The bad thing about StL is the "old money". That is, StL was the 4th largest city in US, 110yrs ago and falling ever since. "Old money" are people that have made their money and cashed out, living on their portfolios. St. Louis is also mired in these little fiefdom towns that spend most efforts trying to steal another fiefdom's business than working together to bring in out of area business.
KC is western. Hearing "Howdy" is common. You'd never hear that in StL.
StL is eastern. You'll hear "Soda", instead of "Pop". Plus, apparently we think all Indianians are white trash. Only place you will hear white trash referred to as "Hoosiers".
Posted on 5/23/14 at 5:26 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Kansas City is the 4th most exciting place in Missouri behind St. Louis, Columbia and Rolla.
Congratulations!
May 21, 2014, 8:22am CDT
Kansas City is fourth most exciting place (in Missouri)
Kansas City Business Journal
Kansas City finished off the podium, according to a new list of the "10 most exciting places in Missouri" released by Movoto, a real estate research website.
Kansas City was ranked No. 4, behind St. Louis, Rolla and Columbia.
Of Kansas City, the website wrote: "Clearly the most exciting of the Kansas Cities, this one ranked well in our analysis for a hopping nightlife, tons of music venues, plus a variety of arts and entertainment options per capita."
The website compiled this ranking by looking at all the cities in Missouri with a population of 10,000 or more. Then, using census and business listings, they compiled data around seven different criteria: nightlife per capita, live music venues per capita, active life options per capita, arts and entertainment per capita, fast food restaurants per capita, percentage of restaurants not fast food and percentage of young residents (ages 18-34).
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News