Started By
Message
re: Why haven't more cable providers gotten on board with the SEC network?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:22 am to Al Bundy Bulldog
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:22 am to Al Bundy Bulldog
quote:
Why not let viewers CHOOSE then a-la carte. I have a feeling many southerners will choose to pay a few bucks extra a month esp during football season.
That is not the doing of the cable company, that is the doing of ESPN.
ESPN doesn't want $10 bucks from the percent of people that get the premium channels. They want $1+ from EVERYONE subscribed to cable in SEC states.
If they give in and allow it on premium channels, the miss out on a larger pie. I wouldn't be surprised if that is allowed in non-SEC markets though.
The whole thing that drives the conference network concept as defined by the Big 10 is to milk the shite out of your base.
If we could chose some people would chose no football at all (like a woman that never watches sports), then ESPN 1 and 2 would also be screwed and the huge pile of money the SEC gets from them each year OUTSIDE the SECN would go down the shitter.
This post was edited on 5/7/14 at 9:24 am
0
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News