Started By
Message

re: Why haven't more cable providers gotten on board with the SEC network?

Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:17 am to
Posted by Al Bundy Bulldog
The Grindfather
Member since Dec 2010
35823 posts
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Because the sec network is charging too much


Why not let viewers CHOOSE then a-la carte. I have a feeling many southerners will choose to pay a few bucks extra a month esp during football season.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33416 posts
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Why not let viewers CHOOSE then a-la carte.


Oh, you want to pick and choose which channels you get?

Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34346 posts
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Why not let viewers CHOOSE then a-la carte. I have a feeling many southerners will choose to pay a few bucks extra a month esp during football season.



That is not the doing of the cable company, that is the doing of ESPN.

ESPN doesn't want $10 bucks from the percent of people that get the premium channels. They want $1+ from EVERYONE subscribed to cable in SEC states.

If they give in and allow it on premium channels, the miss out on a larger pie. I wouldn't be surprised if that is allowed in non-SEC markets though.

The whole thing that drives the conference network concept as defined by the Big 10 is to milk the shite out of your base.

If we could chose some people would chose no football at all (like a woman that never watches sports), then ESPN 1 and 2 would also be screwed and the huge pile of money the SEC gets from them each year OUTSIDE the SECN would go down the shitter.
This post was edited on 5/7/14 at 9:24 am
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58164 posts
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:


Why not let viewers CHOOSE then a-la carte




why do people think this would somehow give them cheaper TV?

there is ZERO chance you could get a channel like SECN for less than $50-$100 a month if that happened.

ESPN, ESPN2, and ESPNU would cost even more.
This post was edited on 5/7/14 at 9:30 am
Posted by DCRebel
An office somewhere
Member since Aug 2009
17644 posts
Posted on 5/7/14 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Why not let viewers CHOOSE then a-la carte.


Different issue altogether.

You asked a question, you got the correct answer.

FWIW, I agree with you on allowing consumers to have more choice.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter