Started By
Message
re: Mizzou is in for a shitty season
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:46 pm to TTsTowel
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:46 pm to TTsTowel
quote:Starting QB. Yes, Mauk is probably better. But he only completed 51% of his passes. 8 of his 11 TDs came against UK and Tennessee.
They do lose a lot of production and starters...
They also lost their top 3 receivers including DGB and top rusher. All in all they lose 195 catches and 2,621 yards. Return only 72 catches.
1
Posted on 4/30/14 at 11:12 pm to CockRocket
You don't know enough about Mizzou football to spout off. Mauk will be just fine, probably better than Franklin. We had loads of talent and depth at WR. I'm only shocked that you left out the loss of Josey at RB too. Of course you probably didn't realize that we used 3 RB's almost equally and our 4th will step right into the 3rd spot this year.
If you knew a damn thing you would have hinged your argument on our loss of Sam and Ealy. Golden and Ray will put up similar numbers to Sam and Ealy (actually they just about did last year) but the problem is there isn't much depth behind them. We don't have a "Golden" and "Ray" coming off the bench. We are also thin at LB.
No, instead your inferiority complex and insecurities get the best of you and you spout nonsense because that's all you know.
If you knew a damn thing you would have hinged your argument on our loss of Sam and Ealy. Golden and Ray will put up similar numbers to Sam and Ealy (actually they just about did last year) but the problem is there isn't much depth behind them. We don't have a "Golden" and "Ray" coming off the bench. We are also thin at LB.
No, instead your inferiority complex and insecurities get the best of you and you spout nonsense because that's all you know.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News