Started By
Message

re: What meets the qualifications of a rivarly game to be considered legitimate?

Posted on 4/16/14 at 4:05 pm to
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 4:05 pm to
Do you realize y'all only have a 3 game lead over them? Kansas, one of worst BCS programs ever.
Posted by TigerNick23
Member since Dec 2013
2326 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

one of worst BCS programs ever.


South Carolina do you realize Clemson has a 65-42 overall lead even with USCe winning the last 5 games. South Carolina do you realize Georgia leads 47-17 in overall series. You guys can't even be competitive
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 4/16/14 at 4:16 pm to
Not that I'd ever stick up for them but you may have the Beakers confused with K-State in terms of the worst ever moniker.

Aside from that, something about throwing records out the window when it comes to rivalry games does tend to apply in this case. The rivalry over the years tended to be defined by two things: Mizzou lived and breathed to beat ku in basketball, and ku lived and breathed to beat Mizzou in football.

"We’re the good people, they’re the bad people. That’s the best way I know to explain it. I don’t like their people, I don’t like their players, I don’t like a damn thing about ’em.” - former (now deceased) KU football coach Don Fambrough on Missouri.

Mizzou fans return Coach Fambrough's love:

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter