Started By
Message
Proposed rule changes for next season.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:49 am
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:49 am
Appears the NCAA is wanting to speed up the games.
•Reducing the number of timeouts.
•The reduction of the shot clock...
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock.
There are a few other rules on the table — widening the lane, using the NBA’s continuation rule, no scoring on charges — but those four are the big four that have been complained about the most.
LINK
SIAP
•Reducing the number of timeouts.
•The reduction of the shot clock...
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock.
There are a few other rules on the table — widening the lane, using the NBA’s continuation rule, no scoring on charges — but those four are the big four that have been complained about the most.
LINK
SIAP
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:50 am to DaleDenton
Would have been nice to specify what sport in the title.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:50 am to DaleDenton
quote:
•Reducing the number of timeouts.
This needs to happen. Teams already have the TV timeouts.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:51 am to DaleDenton
•Reducing the number of timeouts. Good
•The reduction of the shot clock... Good
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts Bad
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock. Good
•The reduction of the shot clock... Good
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts Bad
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock. Good
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:56 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Eliminating live-ball timeouts
I dont think this makes it, probably shouldnt at least
Posted on 4/11/14 at 9:56 am to DaleDenton
Enforcing current rules would be a better start - travelling, offense intiated contact, flops...
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:01 am to DaleDenton
quote:
•The reduction of the shot clock...
about f-ing time
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:02 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Appears the NCAA is wanting to speed up the games.
Don't they know that speeding up the game will lead to more injuries??? Faster play means more trips up and down the court, which means greater fatigue, and THAT is when injuries happen!
How many players are going to have to die before the NCAA recognizes it's folly!?!?
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:04 am to DaleDenton
quote:
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock.
this definitely needs to happen
quote:
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts
this does not need to happen
Posted on 4/11/14 at 10:12 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Appears the NCAA is wanting to speed up the games.
•Reducing the number of timeouts.
•The reduction of the shot clock...
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock.
There are a few other rules on the table —widening the lane, using the NBA’s continuation rule, no scoring on charges —but those four are the big four that have been complained about the most.
I agree with all of these with the exception of removing the live ball time out and adding the NBA continuation. However, I'm not 100% against removing the live ball time out. I'm for rewarding good defense.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 11:53 am to DaleDenton
I see the NCAA is asserting their relevance again by changing rules. This is essentially what the US Congress does as well.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 11:58 am to DaleDenton
need to specify this is basketball.
i like those four along with widening the lane, I don't like the nba continuation rule and the charges stuff.
eta: actually don't think we should lower the shot clock unless it is by 5 seconds
I do think bailing offensive guys out for minimal contact should be addressed. if you are out of control the d should have more leeway with contact.
i like those four along with widening the lane, I don't like the nba continuation rule and the charges stuff.
eta: actually don't think we should lower the shot clock unless it is by 5 seconds
I do think bailing offensive guys out for minimal contact should be addressed. if you are out of control the d should have more leeway with contact.
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 4/11/14 at 12:39 pm to DaleDenton
BBall has way too many damn timeouts both official and team wise.
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:03 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
•Reducing the number of timeouts.
Reduce it by one timeout and you only get 3 in the second half.
quote:
•The reduction of the shot clock...
This needed to happen years ago, if NCAA wanted the game sped up and higher scoring, than this is a no brainer. 24 or 30 seconds would be fine.
quote:
•Eliminating live-ball timeouts
I like this as well, if a defense has you trapped, you shouldn't be able to call a timeout.
quote:
•Changing the 10-second rule so that a team has ten seconds total to cross half court. Calling a timeout in the back court currently refreshes the clock.
Yes, please.
All of these need to happen. Along with every ref calling the game like they did in the NCAA tourney. No more 60 fouls a game bull shite that SEC refs like to pull.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News