Started By
Message

re: Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution

Posted on 4/6/14 at 11:48 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108976 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

I'll wait until transitional fossils are found in droves, and only then will I begin to consider evolution somewhat valid. After all, Darwin him self said we should be tripping over these transitional fossils if his theory is true.



Everything is a transitional fossil. This is the dumbest fricking point ever that anti-evolutionists constantly bring up. What do you want them to name a newly found extinct animal? Could you imagine a museum opening up saying, "This is our newest exihibit, the 1/2 wolf, 1/3 Hyena, 1/8 Bear, and 1/20 Panda species"? Because that is the absolute debauchery you are demanding.
This post was edited on 4/6/14 at 11:52 pm
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36115 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

What do you want them to name a newly found extinct animal?


That arch just keeps getting more and more crowded.
Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 1:09 am to
quote:

Everything is a transitional fossil. This is the dumbest fricking point ever that anti-evolutionists constantly bring up. What do you want them to name a newly found extinct animal? Could you imagine a museum opening up saying, "This is our newest exihibit, the 1/2 wolf, 1/3 Hyena, 1/8 Bear, and 1/20 Panda species"? Because that is the absolute debauchery you are demanding.


I'm still looking for the fossils that prove that bats and whales are related. After all that is what most people claim. That bats evolved into whales.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter