Started By
Message
re: Does Sumlin need to ban his players from going to Northgate
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:24 pm to Cooter Davenport
Posted on 4/7/14 at 2:24 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
What we really need to do is get some booster who is a lawyer to run interference for these football players and get across to CSPD that if you mess with one of Sumlin's players you will be filling our more paperwork and be forced to show up in court more times than you ever dreamed possible.
FIFY
Make it hell for them and they will stop.
Posted on 4/7/14 at 8:37 pm to cardboardboxer
More time in court...the cops then say "more overtime, because I was in court"
Posted on 4/7/14 at 8:54 pm to Slotback
Yep. Cops love it when they get subpoenas for court on their days off. Overtime
Posted on 4/7/14 at 9:52 pm to Warrior Poet
quote:
Yep. Cops love it when they get subpoenas for court on their days off. Overtime
Again ACAB
Posted on 4/7/14 at 9:54 pm to cardboardboxer
Yeah even a booster superlawyer doesn't really have the capacity to make a cop's life hell. In practice a ton of of Class Cs just get dismissed when any schmoe lawyer shows up. "You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride."
If we're theorycrafting sleaze you'd be better off hooking up some CSPD chiefs with one of those new luxury boxes we're constructing.
If we're theorycrafting sleaze you'd be better off hooking up some CSPD chiefs with one of those new luxury boxes we're constructing.
This post was edited on 4/7/14 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 4/7/14 at 11:27 pm to Iosh
quote:
If we're theorycrafting sleaze you'd be better off hooking up some CSPD chiefs with one of those new luxury boxes we're constructing.
Sorry I wasn't trying to advocate for outright sleaze, in fact that is the kind of support that can get a lot of programs in trouble. I just think what happened in this case (completely formulated from baseless rumors I have heard I admit) was BS.
All that needs to get across is the point these aren't defenseless boys. In my experience with CSPD, that was often enough to make them move on to lower-hanging fruit.
Like:
This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 9:12 am
Posted on 7/24/14 at 7:09 pm to Dr RC
I guess I was wrong. He needs to ban them from leaving campus.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:58 pm to Dr RC
Goes back to my question in the other thread about the Big 5 pushing for dedicated athletic dorms to make a return. To me the NCAA made a very big mistake with that rule. Put 'em in the same dorm and lock their dumb asses down the first two years, sez me.
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:36 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
That's just an apartment complex, right? What would that solve? They'll just find another, and in any case it isn't an apartment complex's job to supervise tenants.
Cain Hall, sez me. Mandatory for 2 years and no traipsing out at dark to raise hell. Worked for all us old fart CT's. It'll work for the football team, too. Indeed it DID work for them before your time. All it needs is the Big 5 pushing it, in their new push for "autonomy".
Cain Hall, sez me. Mandatory for 2 years and no traipsing out at dark to raise hell. Worked for all us old fart CT's. It'll work for the football team, too. Indeed it DID work for them before your time. All it needs is the Big 5 pushing it, in their new push for "autonomy".
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:38 pm to finestfirst79
I was joking it just happens to be the place where a lot of our bad shite with players goes down
Posted on 7/24/14 at 9:38 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Tell me about this ranch
Posted on 7/24/14 at 11:04 pm to Captain Crown
Posted on 7/25/14 at 10:21 am to finestfirst79
quote:
Cain Hall, sez me. Mandatory for 2 years and no traipsing out at dark to raise hell. Worked for all us old fart CT's. It'll work for the football team, too. Indeed it DID work for them before your time. All it needs is the Big 5 pushing it, in their new push for "autonomy".
Okay, Charlie.
Latest Texas A&M News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News