Started By
Message
If union at NW wins, say goodbye to Title 9
Posted on 4/5/14 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 4/5/14 at 12:50 pm
"If it holds that athletes are employees, Title IX, which refers to access to education, may not apply, said Ellen J. Staurowsky, a professor of sports management at Drexel and an expert on Title IX and college sports reform."
NY Times article 4/3 by Jere Longman.
Isn't this what most AD's have been hoping for?
NY Times article 4/3 by Jere Longman.
Isn't this what most AD's have been hoping for?
Posted on 4/5/14 at 1:21 pm to matthew25
Better to keep paying them under the table while praying you don't get caught in the process.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 1:26 pm to matthew25
quote:
"If it holds that athletes are employees, Title IX, which refers to access to education, may not apply, said Ellen J. Staurowsky, a professor of sports management at Drexel and an expert on Title IX and college sports reform."
Sounds like a BS statement by a supposed expert. From the bill itself:
quote:
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.
Title IX is FAR more than access to education.....
Posted on 4/5/14 at 2:00 pm to matthew25
I'm way past giving a shite but if it gets rid of title IX that's good in my book.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 2:05 pm to matthew25
Good. Title 9 its stupid. No reason women's softball players deserves the same benefits as a player of a revenue generating sport like football.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News