Started By
Message

re: As a recruit.. Texas or Texas A&M

Posted on 4/10/14 at 4:43 pm to
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80564 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 4:43 pm to
Sumlin's first class was ranked 16th with 19 players. Was at 24 before his hire.

Strong's first class was ranked 17th. Was at 9 before his hire.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Sumlin's first class was ranked 16th with 19 players. Was at 24 before his hire.

Strong's first class was ranked 17th. Was at 9 before his hire.



Posted by Manzielathon
Death Valley
Member since Sep 2013
8951 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Sumlin's first class was ranked 16th with 19 players. Was at 24 before his hire.

Strong's first class was ranked 17th. Was at 9 before his hire.


Posted by Socratics
Virginia Beach
Member since Dec 2013
2465 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Sumlin's first class was ranked 16th with 19 players. Was at 24 before his hire.

Strong's first class was ranked 17th. Was at 9 before his hire.


That's cute and all ,but that doesn't mean shite unless you actually do something with it. Your still one of the most underachieving teams in modern college football. Given your talent levels, you should have a Coaches' Trophy. The Big 3 in Florida each have multiple titles and Texas mirror Florida in terms of talent levels so get it done already.

Texas is better and its not really worth discussing until A&M wins a title.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33370 posts
Posted on 4/10/14 at 11:15 pm to
I don't get why aggy keeps disparaging Strong, he's accomplished way more than Sumlin in his career.
This post was edited on 4/10/14 at 11:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter