Started By
Message

re: RPI Manipulation for Dummies

Posted on 3/16/14 at 6:13 pm to
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 6:13 pm to
You ruined it.


It looks like that was a winning combination for NCST.


I was just talking the other day how it'd be better if we'd quit scheduling creampuffs in the 250+ RPI range and play like 10 OOC schools like UCLA, Indiana, North Carolina, Kansas, Duke, Syracuse etc for a tier 1 name opponent. Then 4 or 5 tier 2's like Maryland, Boston College, St. John's, Baylor, Oklahoma St., Michigan, Villanova, Seton Hall, Arizona, Gonazaga etc. and then some teams from BCS conferences that have name value like Minnesota, Kansas St., Texas, Cal, Stanford, Penn St., Georgia Tech, Wake Forest, etc.

It doesn't seem to matter that much if you lose to them or not when playing a sub 100 RPI drops you regardless of outcome of the game.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99738 posts
Posted on 3/16/14 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

It doesn't seem to matter that much if you lose to them or not when playing a sub 100 RPI drops you regardless of outcome of the game.


Apparently it depends on who you are. Kentucky had the #5 SOS. St. Louis got a better seed than us by quite a bit and didn't even win their conference tournament. They didn't beat a currently ranked team all season.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter