Started By
Message
re: Would you prefer the selection committee have concrete qualifiers or not?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:08 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:08 pm to DaleDenton
You're describing a completely different issue. Of course postseason college football will continue to exist, but the selection committee is an entirely new animal. The BCS was blamed for having to pick two teams and the problems associated with that. Instead of just allowing the BCS to choose four teams rather than two, the choice is now in the hands of a few individuals. Should they not be bound to at least some form of precedence to remove bias? Expanding is just punting on the issue, and it will just pop right back up in seeding.
2
Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:12 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
All it really does is resort back to a committee selecting the teams for the bowls, err playoffs.
Instead of the bowl committees doing what's best for their pocket, it is a centralized committee picking for them for two games.
Money bias will still remain the pockets will change, the TV networks will try to influence the teams selected.
Instead of the bowl committees doing what's best for their pocket, it is a centralized committee picking for them for two games.
Money bias will still remain the pockets will change, the TV networks will try to influence the teams selected.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 1:48 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
Top 4 of the BCS.
It's really not that complicated.
It's really not that complicated.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News