Started By
Message
re: Would you prefer the selection committee have concrete qualifiers or not?
Posted on 3/12/14 at 12:28 pm to parkjas2001
Posted on 3/12/14 at 12:28 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
IF they do that, then all teams will work to meet that criteria and many more than 4 will lclaim to have met such criteria.
I was referring to ways the committee will sort the teams. Conference champs is the most obvious answer, but there undoubtedly be more whether public or not and it will get complicated, and possibly very biased, fast. Did team x make it's CCG? Did team y's entire conference finish the season unranked in polls? Does a one loss PAC12 CCG loser get in over a three loss conf champ?
2
Posted on 3/12/14 at 12:29 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
I was referring to ways the committee will sort the teams.
So am I.
Posted on 3/12/14 at 12:32 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
quote:
I was referring to ways the committee will sort the teams. Conference champs is the most obvious answer, but there undoubtedly be more whether public or not and it will get complicated, and possibly very biased, fast. Did team x make it's CCG? Did team y's entire conference finish the season unranked in polls? Does a one loss PAC12 CCG loser get in over a three loss conf champ?
They will do the same thing they do in basketball to justify/explain why a team did or did not get in.
The "eye test"...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News