Started By
Message

re: moral equivalency? hunh vs flopping

Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 4:20 pm to
congrats. Stupidest post of 2014. even for a Gump.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91654 posts
Posted on 3/8/14 at 5:59 pm to
I'm OK with a player faking an injury. It is within the rules, to the extent of no one knowing whether the player is hurt or not. It's a loophole in the system, IMO.
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 3/9/14 at 4:18 am to
quote:

Who here is for hunh and their ability to exploit the rules to the fullest to gain offensive advantages such as stopping defensive substitution, putting pressure on the officials, etc, yet find the idea of defensive players Dropping for less than traumatic injuries reprehensible?


I got no issue with it.
Posted by BruinsWoo
Member since Feb 2014
118 posts
Posted on 3/9/14 at 11:38 am to
It's not within the rules to fake an injury to slow down an offense, but there's really no way to enforce it either.
Posted by Sig
dallas
Member since Oct 2010
2035 posts
Posted on 3/9/14 at 12:20 pm to
easy to fix flopping.. you have a cramp, might as well sit a full series so you can rest your fat.

Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 3/9/14 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

A little poll. Who here is for hunh and their ability to exploit the rules to the fullest to gain offensive advantages such as stopping defensive substitution, putting pressure on the officials, etc, yet find the idea of defensive players Dropping for less than traumatic injuries reprehensible? Its just within the rules (how does a player know whether he is having heat stroke or is just tired? Hes not a doctor, why chance it? ). How many of you would be screaming for a new rule to stop it if it suddenly became prevalent? How many of the brave coaches championing the current set of rules would be screaming for a new rule? Ill hang up and listen.


As much as I detest this post for being incredibly whiny, I'll give my opinion:

The HUNH (i.e. snapping the ball as quickly as possible) doesn't violate any rules nor is it unethical. It provides the offense an advantage, but it isn't an unfair one. If they don't substitute, the defense isn't going to get a good opportunity to substitute either. Both parties have the same amount of time pre-snap to prepare for play.

Faking an injury, however, does provide what I'd argue is an unfair advantage. And if you want to argue that it isn't an unfair advantage, then I'd argue it is most certainly unethical, and I believe someone posted an excerpt before where it is officially given the description of unethical by the ruling parties of college football.

Therefore, while I believe phrases such as "exploit the rules" make your premise a very flawed one, anyone that argues that they want to preserve the integrity of the game but in the same breath argues that faking injuries is what they'd advocate because fast paced offenses aren't going away is taking contradictory stances.
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 9:01 am to
One's against the rules and the other isn't. The end.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 3:09 pm to
Well, we're talking about player safety, right? .. maybe if a player is injured he should sit out for the rest of the series.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter