Started By
Message
re: The Real Question is: Who Will Win the East in 2014? Mizzou or Georgia?
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:04 pm to MenloDawg
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:04 pm to MenloDawg
quote:
we trade them to the ACC for Clemson.
I don't really know the history of the SEC, but is there a reason that SC was added to the SEC over Clemson, which was far more prestigious and had an athletic program that was light years ahead of SC?
My guess is that UGA and UT just didn't want a team that would ever be competitive, but I'm still learning about the nuts and bolts of this great conference.
3
Posted on 2/8/14 at 12:11 pm to roadhouse
As a mizzou fan, I'm feeling pretty confident, but afraid we could turn into what Texas a&m became after this year pending on the development of our young talent. When golden and ray leave it could be rough, but hell, other than ealy no one saw our d-line having the kind of year they had so it could repeat. Hope so ;)
Posted on 2/9/14 at 8:39 am to roadhouse
quote:
I don't really know the history of the SEC, but is there a reason that SC was added to the SEC over Clemson, which was far more prestigious and had an athletic program that was light years ahead of SC?
Good question. Any answers? Rantards?
Posted on 2/9/14 at 12:25 pm to roadhouse
quote:Got SC on your mind, huh?
I don't really know the history of the SEC, but is there a reason that SC was added to the SEC over Clemson, which was far more prestigious and had an athletic program that was light years ahead of SC?
Thanks for your interest in SC athletics.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News