Started By
Message

re: Well, Peyton sucks.

Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:14 pm to
Posted by mrnegative
The great SA
Member since Oct 2012
923 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 1:14 pm to
Saying Peyton isn't good because no rings (on current team), is the same thing as saying jff isn't good because no titles. Both teams had a horrible defense when it mattered. I know manning lost the game because of his two nits and only 8 points, but that doesn't mean he is a horrible qb. In the game, it felt like he had to start forcing throws or making big plays (like jff) due to the anti-tackle cologne the defense was wearing. He was also pressured every play and the defense knew it was a pass play due to a lack of running. I guess what I'm getting at here is that winning a Super Bowl or sec title isn't a one man job, it's a team effort. Teams who have won a Super Bowl/title do well in 3 of the 4: running, passing, defense, and/or special teams. If Peyton had played well, he still wouldn't have done well because his team was lacking in the running, special teams, and defense categories. Jff couldn't win a title because his team lacked in two of these almost every game (defense, special teams).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter