Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/23/14 at 3:49 pm to tylerdurden24
If someone can tell me how many sweeps tre mason took I'll give my answer.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 3:53 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
If someone can tell me how many sweeps tre mason took I'll give my answer.
None.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 3:55 pm to BamaDoc14
Mason for sure. Ingram never deserved the Heisman.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 3:58 pm to BamaDoc14
Richardson. Or Lacy.
This post was edited on 1/23/14 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 1/23/14 at 3:59 pm to The_Joker
quote:
Alex Collins
Oh. You were serious?
Kid is going to be pretty solid and I guess I'd want him if I had Bama or AU's O-line for him to run behind.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 4:06 pm to skrayper
quote:
No one says that about Gino Toretta.
A) Gino Toretta wasn't an RB in the SEC.
B) Toretta is regularly listed as a one of the "worst ever" Heisman winners, so I think he still counts toward that to some extent.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 4:07 pm to BamaDoc14
Ingram by an electron of an atom of a molecule of a pubic hair.
Honestly I'd take either one.
Put it this way:
The year Ingram won the Heisman, Mason probably would have won it too, or come darn close.
The year Mason was a finalist (this past year), I think Ingram may have not won, but finished higher.
Honestly I'd take either one.
Put it this way:
The year Ingram won the Heisman, Mason probably would have won it too, or come darn close.
The year Mason was a finalist (this past year), I think Ingram may have not won, but finished higher.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 4:14 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
If someone can tell me how many sweeps tre mason took I'll give my answer.
what?
Posted on 1/23/14 at 4:15 pm to BamaDoc14
Mason because he should've been ours
Posted on 1/23/14 at 4:32 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
Gurley
I'm with this guy. Or Hill.
But between the two I get the idea Ingram works better in our system.
This post was edited on 1/23/14 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 1/23/14 at 4:42 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
I know LSU fans hate Ingram because of his time with the Saints
Meh, Ingram had a hell of a year in 2009, still think Gerhart earned the Heisman though.
If I had to choose, I might take Mason's 2013 season over Ingram's 2009 season. Mason just seems a little harder to catch and tackle than Ingram.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 6:56 pm to wadewilson
quote:
I know LSU fans hate Ingram because of his time with the Saints
In his career, he has been paid too much and produced too little.
However, he can wave a towel on the sideline with the best of them.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:28 pm to beaver
quote:He still rushed for over 1,000 yards. That, to me, speaks volumes for his quality.
you see what Tre did in 2012 when the offense was totally inept?
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:31 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
Mark Ingram:
Best Year: 2009
vs ranked teams: 150 att, 941 yards, 6.3 Avg, 8 TD
vs SEC: 194 att, 1143 yards, 5.9 avg., 10 TD
vs Non-Conf: 77 att, 515 yds,6.7 avg. 7 TD
32 Receptions for 334 yards, 3 TDs
quote:
Tre Mason
Best Year: 2013
vs ranked teams: 176 att, 970 yds, 5.5 avg, 10 TDs
vs SEC: 238 att, 1289 yds, 5.4 avg, 17 Tds
vs Non-Conf: 70 att, 529 yds, 6.7 avg, 6 TD
12 receptions 163 yds. 1 TD
Math must not be your strong suit. I looked at this for about 10 seconds and saw that.
WrongInfo:dr
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:32 pm to BamaDoc14
Lincoln. Did eye win?
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:33 pm to BZ853
Wow. 26 more carries, 29 more yards. Math sucks.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:40 pm to nc14
Less carries, more yards. Look at the bold.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:44 pm to BZ853
Versus competition. Hell, I can run against Samford.
Posted on 1/23/14 at 8:44 pm to BamaDoc14
I'd take Mason
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News