Started By
Message

re: Coker and the Masoli rule

Posted on 1/23/14 at 9:43 am to
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30265 posts
Posted on 1/23/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

What? My butthurt about a rule that was created after we took advantage of it? Are you slow?


I'm aggravated by the existence of the rule in the first place which was brought about by the faux moral outrage of taking Masoli after he'd been kicked off the team. Slive and the SEC have no problem if a kid goes JUCO and comes back( Pettway, Cam, Marshall, etc) what does one year matter? It's hypocrisy at its finest.
Folks/fans were all pissed after Nutt offered/signed 35 recruits in one year, so the conference capped that shite to 27 to appease the angered public.

Folks/fans were all pissed that Masoli (a good QB) got kicked off the Oregon team, Ole Miss got him, so the conference created a rule to appease the angered public. No more 1 and done transfers.

Folks/fans were all pissed that Bama was "over-signing", so the conference capped that shite AGAIN, now the limit is 25.

Folks/fans were all pissed that Bama and LSU, both SEC teams played in the '11 BCSNC game. So now we have a fricking 4 team playoff where the teams will be determined by a fricking committee.

Let's see how much more damage can be done to college football, I'm sure more rules and restrictions can be created to placte the public.
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46495 posts
Posted on 1/23/14 at 9:47 am to
Amen to all of that. We are going to see a similar response to UT's class this year too. At least we have Archie on the committee to help us out except for LSU obviously.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter