What? My butthurt about a rule that was created after we took advantage of it? Are you slow?

I'm aggravated by the existence of the rule in the first place which was brought about by the faux moral outrage of taking Masoli after he'd been kicked off the team. Slive and the SEC have no problem if a kid goes JUCO and comes back( Pettway, Cam, Marshall, etc) what does one year matter? It's hypocrisy at its finest.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by PorkSammich

North FL

Member since Sep 2013

14281 posts

Posted on 1/23/14 at 9:34 am to DMagic

Careful.

Ole Miss and Auburn are both trying last minute pitches to Coker.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by RT1941

Member since May 2007

30273 posts

Posted on 1/23/14 at 9:43 am to DMagic

quote:
What? My butthurt about a rule that was created after we took advantage of it? Are you slow?

I'm aggravated by the existence of the rule in the first place which was brought about by the faux moral outrage of taking Masoli after he'd been kicked off the team. Slive and the SEC have no problem if a kid goes JUCO and comes back( Pettway, Cam, Marshall, etc) what does one year matter? It's hypocrisy at its finest.

Folks/fans were all pissed after Nutt offered/signed 35 recruits in one year, so the conference capped that shite to 27 to appease the angered public.

Folks/fans were all pissed that Masoli (a good QB) got kicked off the Oregon team, Ole Miss got him, so the conference created a rule to appease the angered public. No more 1 and done transfers.

Folks/fans were all pissed that Bama was "over-signing", so the conference capped that shite AGAIN, now the limit is 25.

Folks/fans were all pissed that Bama and LSU, both SEC teams played in the '11 BCSNC game. So now we have a fricking 4 team playoff where the teams will be determined by a fricking committee.

Let's see how much more damage can be done to college football, I'm sure more rules and restrictions can be created to placte the public.