Started By
Message
re: AU and USCe-Is it the shoes?
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:00 pm to marshallcotiger
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:00 pm to marshallcotiger
Well USC is playing 7 freshmen and lost their best guard to an injury this week, so I think it's primarily that.
Underarmour does lag behind in their footwear compared to their competitors though. I have heard some football players complain about the underarmour cleats. But I don't think they would blame any losses on them
Underarmour does lag behind in their footwear compared to their competitors though. I have heard some football players complain about the underarmour cleats. But I don't think they would blame any losses on them
2
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:05 pm to Cockopotamus
missing the point. the op is basically suggesting nike/adidas bribe students to go to those schools, somehow
Posted on 1/18/14 at 10:10 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Underarmour does lag behind in their footwear compared to their competitors though. I have heard some football players complain about the underarmour cleats. But I don't think they would blame any losses on them
From what I've heard their issues in football are pretty much in the past.
I know when we first signed with them all the players wore New Balance cleats with tape over the logos, but Under Armour has really come a long way.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News